Nofanneeded said:it is not about me, it is about the review itself, the NVME SSD I put there are at the same price range and it is not fair for them that you put on inferior TBW product a Pro. because you never tested any TBW to be sure who is lying and who is not. Not fair for ther product and not fair for the other products.Īs for some mnufacturer cheat in the TBW numbers, well this can be said for the Reviewd 600TBW SSD as well. if this 600TBW is respectable then what will you call 1600TBW and the same price and speed ? it is almost 3X. It is not about me, it is about the review itself, the NVME SSD I put there are at the same price range and it is not fair for them that you put on inferior TBW product a Pro. Does Crystal Disk Info report full link speed? Got enough free space? Did you just clone or migrate all your data to the drive? if so, you may just need to envoke Windows Optimize/Trim and let it have some idle time, maybe leave it on overnight, to recover. Hmm, could have some configuration issues. That gives it about a 30-year life span when it comes to writing endurance alone if the real-world endurance result actually matches the rating. And, they match high-end drives like the Samsung 970 EVO Plus and WD Black SN750.Īs well, how much endurance actually matters? What is your workload? Do you know how much PC users write to their drives on average? It's 5-10TB a year, at most 20TB, usually with write amplification from what I've gathered.Ĭonsidering 600TB is 6x more than a high-average (100TB) of writes over 5-years, I'd say its respectable. They don't necessarily correspond to actual product endurance. Seanwebster said:The thing is, these are warranted endurance ratings. If you need a larger drive, you should look into the KC2000 as an alternative. Kingston’s A2000 is available in mainstream capacities that stretch from 250GB up to 1TB.

Adata acronis license key